IuM Takes Mirwaiz Head On Over Suspension
Srinagar, Apr 27, KONS: Hurling a slew of charges against Mirwaiz Umer Farooq for serious constitutional improprieties in the past, suspended Hurriyat (M) constituent, the Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (IuM), on Wednesday formally challenged the alliance chairman’s “discretionary powers” to take action against the party and its patron for receiving New Delhi’s interlocutors on Kashmir.
In reply to a show cause notice issued against it by the alliance, the IuM sought to turn the tables on the Mirwaiz, citing his overturning the Hurriyat (M)’s original policy on 2009 general elections, meeting the all-party parliamentary delegation from New Delhi during the unrest last summer, and his silence on taday’s Panchayat Elections as instances of his numerous arbitrary decisions which, according to the party, had gone without censure.
It said that the decision to suspend Maulana Abbas was “devoid of munificence and mutual respect” as, according to it, the name of the IuM patron had been played up in an unfavourable light by “irresponsible” statements from the Mirwaiz.
Maintaining that the interlocutors had dropped in at the residence of Maulana Abbas totally unannounced, and that the latter’s hospitality in keeping with Islamic mores in no way violated the Hurriyat policy on the issue, the party rejected its suspension by the Mirwaiz as “unconstitutional, peremptory and one-sided,” saying that the decision had been taken without giving it a chance to clarify its position.
“Your decision is unconstitutional, as according to section 2 of the Hurriyat constitution the authority on such measures is vested solely in the majlis-e-shura,” the IuM chief Maulana Masroor Ansari wrote to the Mirwaiz in his 6-page response today, asserting that his party’s suspension had been the Hurriyat (M) chairman’s personal move and not of the alliance.
“It is altogether a different matter that three days after the IuM’s suspension, the Hurriyat majlis-e-shura decided that the chairman had discretionary powers in such matters. Legal experts deem the decision as a total violation of the 1993 charter of the Hurriyat Conference,” he said.
“The unseemly haste with which you have suspended the IuM is surprising and without precedent in forum politics, particularly in a diverse formation like the Hurriyat Conference,” he said.
“Constitutional violations by alliance constituents have never been decided with such haste, but action has been taken only after discussing them in the majlis-e-shura,” he said.
“And there are several instances pertaining to you personally or to your party which have never been raised,” he said.
“In a majority decision on the 2009 parliamentary elections, the Hurriyat executive had declared the polls as a non-issue, and the acting chairman had made the announcement in a press conference on April 15. But only a few days later, this unanimous policy was altered and a new announcement made. Had any formal session of the Hurriyat Conference been convened to overturn the previous joint decision?” Maulana Masroor asked.
“And today, when panchayat elections are being held in the state, why has the Hurriyat Conference tacitly upheld the same decision and not bothered to utter a single word? Why this criminal silence?” he said.
“During last year’s uprising, when the Hurriyat had unanimously decided not to meet the all-party parliamentary delegation from New Delhi, why did you receive them when they called on you at your residence?” he said.
“Did you not have prior notice of the visit? The black arm bands that you wore (at the meeting) to protest against the killing of Kashmiri civilians and other circumstances indicate that you had,” he said.
“Only a few days ago, one of New Delhi’s interlocutors had disclosed that they were in contact with separatists, and that a representative delegation from your party had met the team during its Rajouri visit. Why did you not take any action in this case?” he said.
“The manner in which you have dragged the name of Maulana Abbas is an attempt to impair the public image of the leader and the party which have been fighting for the Kashmir cause since 1960,” he said.
“Maulana Abbas, who had worked alongside Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah during the Plebiscite Front days but parted ways even with him when he reneged on his stand, needs no introduction,” he said.
“He has also been shoulder-to-shoulder with Sofi Muhammad Akbar and your own revered father, the martyred Maulana Muhammad Farooq, after the Mo-e-Muqaddas episode,” he said.
“The Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen has been active for the resolution of the Kashmir issue since 1960, and has a brilliant and unimpeachable record. Its leaders and activists have undergone untold suffering and tragedy,” he said.
“While its top leadership and functionaries have repeatedly become the target of circumstances, Maulana Abbas himself has spent nearly 10 years in jail for demanding the right of self-determination for Jammu and Kashmir,” he said.
“His position in the Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen is much greater than a constitutional authority, and you are fully aware of it,” he said.
(Daily Kashmir Observer, Srinagar)
Abbas’s suspension, IuM terms move unconsitutional
Srinagar, April 27: Responding to the “show cause” notice issued by Hurriyat (M) chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq over meeting between the interlocutors and Maulana Abbas Ansari, Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (IuM) chairman termed the suspension order as an “unconstitutional and unfortunate”.
Mirwaiz had last week suspended IuM after its patron Moulana Abass Ansari held deliberations with the interlocutors at his residence at Nawa Kadal.
In the 6-page letter to Mirwaiz, IuM chairman Masroor Abbas said the issue was blown out of proportion. “Our party will not accept this because the one-sided action has led to a serious jolt to our credibility. We have been up for the Kashmir issue since 1960 and our party is working sincerely for the cause,” he said.
He termed the suspension of IuM from Hurriyat as unconstitutional and unfortunate.
Referring to Moulana Abbas Ansari’s meeting with the interlocutors headed by journalist Dileep Padgoankar, Masroor said the party patron neither violated the Hurriyat decision nor held talks with them. “He only welcomed the guests in lieu with Muslim tradition,” he said adding that the meeting was not a ‘secret’ one.
“We have also attached a copy of email in which Moulana Abbas Ansari has rejected offer by the interlocutors,” he said.
He further said the allegations leveled against the party and its leader are baseless and untrue. “They (interlocutors) had earlier sent us invitation via email for a meeting which we rejected. But when they arrived at our residence without any prior appointment how could we have turned the guests away,” Masroor wrote to Mirwaiz.
He said the IuM has declared that Hurriyat is an asset of Kashmiri nation and his organization will remain part of it. “We will work to make it (Hurriyat) stronger,” he said.
Meanwhile, Hurriyat (M) has called a meeting of its executive and general councils to discuss the issue.
(Daily Rising Kashmir, Srinagar)
IuM challenges suspension, Ansari Responds To Hurriyat Notice
Srinagar, Apr 27: The Ittehad-Ul-Muslimeen on Wednesday responded to the show-cause notice of Hurriyat Conference (M) saying that its suspension was ‘in contravention to the constitution of the conglomerate’ and they had rejected talks with the interlocutors.
In a six-page reply to the notice served by Hurriyat (M), the IuM president Masroor Abbas Ansari said that their suspension was against the constitution of the amalgam.
“We wouldn’t tolerate the way in which the name of our party patron Moulana Abbas Ansari was blown. Due to this unilateral action, some quarters tried to damage the reputation of the party and its patron,” the letter stated.
The party said that they had rejected talks with the interlocutors appointed by the Centre in the wake of last year’s unrest in which 117 youth were killed by forces. Copy of an email turning down the interlocutors’ invitation has also been attached with the letter, IuM said.
About the meeting of Abbas Ansari with the interlocutors on April 20, the party said they had neither violated the constitution of the amalgam nor held talks with them.
“But he only received guests, which is the duty of Muslims," the letter said.
Masroor further said that Moulana had made it clear to the interlocutors that talks should be held directly with the Prime Minister and not with ‘any employee of Government of India.’
“We also told them that for any dialogue on Kashmir the proposal of Hurriyat Conference should be implemented to show the seriousness of New Delhi and the issue should be solved through tripartite talks,” it added.
Hurriyat (M) is now meeting on Thursday to discuss a number of issues including the IuM letter.
“This issue would also come up for discussion tomorrow. It is a general meeting,” Hurriyat (M) chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq told Greater Kashmir.
(Daily Greater Kashmir, Srinagar)